I have often read many people blame the ongoing socioeconomic and political regression in Nigeria on the failure of religion. It sounds logical when one reads them; at least it provides me and those who think like me, a reason why the country has refused to grow. I am one of those who has refused to believe religion has as one of its duties to be the voice of the masses.
What I believe and which I have been unable to frame into a concise intellectual catchphrase, is that organised religion and politics are two mutually reinforcing tools employed by privileged people to undermine fellow human beings.
I needed validation for what was forming in my mind, for about 36 hours, I immersed myself in a lot of research and readings. It did not take time before I came across an article titled, “Despotism, or the Corruption of the Prophet’s Ideals” published in March 2018 by Syrian intellectual, ‘Abd al-Rahmān al-Kawākibī.
In the article, al-Kawākibī says, “Most historians of religions agree that political despotism stems from religious despotism. Others say that, if one does not stem from the other, the two are at least brothers, having abuse of power as their father and supremacy as their mother, or, rather, twins, being united by the need to collaborate in order to subjugate men. The likeness between them consists in the fact that both exercise a form of power, one in the kingdom of bodies and the other in the world of souls.”
Just like Mbaka, who would willingly give a stamp of Divine endorsement to anyone he cajoles into making financial donations to his “Umu Ikuku Ministry,” the Catholic order showed they’d be willing to give anyone who attends their church and takes their Communion, even if the fellow has character flaws worth deprecating.
Bringing it closer home to Nigeria, a researcher, Ibrahim Nureni, in a thesis titled, “Religious Bigotry and Miliary Despotism,” published in the Global Journal of Sociology Current Issues, argued that “religious and political/military despotism is considered to go hand in hand since their ideologies formulate part of the hegemonic, determinist superstructures that push the masses to be at the corner of receiving end.”
Those who follow my writings will agree that starting off with these sorts of backgrounds is not my style. My approach is usually the direct form, but the sensitivity of religion and the manner in which it has over the years been woven into the culture, lifestyles, and belief systems of the people prescribed for me a different approach that I guessed would prepare the mind for what many would consider a rebellious, non-conformist approach to the issue I am about to address.
The demolition of markets, motor parks, a school, and a motherless babies’ home in Nsukka and two major transport hubs in the state capital, by agents of the state government has reignited the debate regarding the mutually reinforcing roles organised religion and politics play in subjugating the people. While the people of Enugu were weeping, wailing, mourning, and gnashing their teeth as they counted their losses in the exercise, the loud, banging silence from the usually vociferous clergy in the state deafened everyone.
Enugu is blessed with vocal charismatic priests and pastors whose proclamations and liturgical teachings make great headlines in both the traditional and social media of information.
Who in Nigeria does not know the track record of Rev. Fr. Ejike Mbaka, the fiery priest known for his fearless engagements with political leaders? Mbaka became who he is today on the back of his fight with former governor of Enugu State, Chimaroke Nnamani. His fight against Nnamani became public following the ban the former governor had placed on certain categories of motorcycles used for transportation in the state. Mbaka held that the then-governor was taking away people’s means of livelihood. He used his pulpit at his Adoration Ministry, Enugu, Nigeria (AMEN) to ostensibly incite the hoi polloi and place curses on the governor. Matters came to a head when on March 7, 2002, 14 people died following a stampede at Mbaka’s adoration night. The priest accused former governor Nnamani of responsibility and went on to allege an attempt on his life, an allegation that eventually became the theme for a song, “O ji Bible ghoro mgbo m” that sold millions of copies.
Mbaka has grown from hero to villain in the eyes of many critical observers, what with his endorsement of the presidency of Muhammadu Buhari (whose administration has been blamed for the country’s economic woes of the past nine years), the open solicitation of money from Peter Obi and his embracement of many unpopular politicians who purportedly won his support with cash exchange. His rebellion against his supervising Bishop between 2020 and 2021 was also indicative of a man given to disobedience, even when his vocation, preachings, teachings, and leanings call for one.
Interestingly, Fr. Mbaka, who wrestled Chimaroke Nnamani in those days has not made any of his usual Homiletical pronouncements since Governor Mbah began his demolitions that have rendered thousands displaced.
The question is a simple, yet foreboding, WHY?
Further north in Nsukka, another vocal member of the clergy has also maintained a disturbing silence towards the unpopular actions of Governor Mbah. Bishop Godfrey Igwebuike Onah is the presiding prelate of the Nsukka Catholic Diocese, who has utilised his cathedra to carve the image of an intellectual cleric for himself. His Homilies are intentional; recorded and edited by experts, and distributed globally through the vehicles of YouTube and other social media channels.
In the Nigerian Catholic community, Bishop Onah is seen as the next, if not the present Bishop Matthew Kukah. Those who followed the exploits of Fr. Kukah when he served as the Secretary of the Catholic Diocese of Lagos would attest to his powerful presence in the media, defending the church and engaging the government on behalf of the people.
Bishop Onah is doing this and more. Not too long ago, his strong position against Omabe, the native masquerade of the Nsukka people gained a lot of traction, especially his position that the tradition has outlived its usefulness and should be discarded, particularly because, as he put it, the Igala people that brought Omabe has gone and Omabe should go too.
Bishop Onah
When I came across the statement, I thought of reminding the Bishop that the white men who brought Christianity to us are no longer here, and as a result, their religion should not linger. I will return to this in an article I promise to write later so we do not mix the issues.
The point I need to make is that nothing has been heard from and of this revered bishop since the government bulldozers were trained like deadly snipers’ guns at the means of livelihood of the people. Nsukka is more than 90 percent Catholic. Even those of us whose spirit left the church during a trying period when this same bishop kept what was a conspiratorial silence as a priest in his diocese attempted to take a swathe of land belonging to my community, still subscribe to the faith in one way or another.
The silence of Fr. Mbaka and Bishop Onah is loud. But you see, these men of God will be better understood with a visit to history and its infinite library of memories. During the elections which brought Peter Mbah to power, the Catholic clergy in Nsukka mobilised their support for Peter Mbah, said to be a Catholic, against Chijioke Edeoga, an Anglican. It was so bad that priests were summoned to meetings where representations were made for the pulpit to be used to mobilise support for Mbah.
I knew this for a fact because some priests in the Nsukka Diocese called to inform me of what was going on and it was the concerns of these priests that inspired the article I wrote during the period, titled, “JUST BEFORE THEY MISLEAD OUR CHIEF EVANGELIST: AN OPEN LETTER TO BISHOP GODFREY ONAH.”
The last election unravelled the ends to which the leadership of the Catholic Church wanted to make of their numerical superiority in Enugu State. Just like Mbaka, who would willingly give a stamp of Divine endorsement to anyone he cajoles into making financial donations to his “Umu Ikuku Ministry,” the Catholic order showed they’d be willing to give anyone who attends their church and takes their Communion, even if the fellow has character flaws worth deprecating.
Over the years, proselytization has passed off religion as the hope of the masses. But the more you examine its roles in the ugly things that happen in many parts of the world, the more you agree that religion has always been willing to conspire with the state to undermine the people. Whether you are speaking of Islam where religion appears to be fused with the sovereign authority, or in Christianity where the dividing lines are illusorily obvious but collaborations active, the reality of organised religion being anti-people has always been undeniable.
You cannot but remember Karl Marx when you listen to the sanctimonious preachings and teachings of most of our religious leaders today. Marx, in one of his most popular works, describes religion’s role in the lives of people as a metaphysical balm for the real suffering in the universe and society. By this, he meant that religion solves no problems but rather, soothes the hurt so you have reason to endure the hurt, even when you remain in the hole.
“Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.”
The aim of religion is the capture of state power either directly or by remote control. That is why, in every election cycle, there is a contest of which religious group or denomination would win the votes. In the southeast, the cancer of Catholics versus Anglicans has consumed the opportunities of many a good candidate who wanted to put in place the real government of the people.
For many, if not most religious leaders, bad political leadership can only exist to the extent of its perpetration by someone other than one of their own. That is the same way corruption is evil, and those responsible for it, hell-bound, provided the names being mentioned are of other religions and denominations.
According to Catholic hamartiology, a branch of Catholic thought that studies transgressions, sin is an “utterance, deed, or desire that offends God, reason, truth, and conscience.” This is what is built into the opium that is fed to the people. In reality, there are qualifications to these, just as was the case in George Orwell’s Animal Farm.
Concerning the Ogige Nsukka market which was recently demolished, many of us agree that the area was already too congested and should be expanded, or some of the businesses there relocated. In the past, the timber and building materials sections of the market were taken elsewhere, the mechanics, who were operating mostly along Enugu Road, were also moved and recently, Ikpa Market was created to take care of the abattoir and the perishable goods sections of the market.
The government did not destroy any person’s livelihood to make these happen.
I know that there are many educated people among the silent clergy in Enugu State. Bishop Onah, Bishop Onaga, and many of them are PhDs. But the fact that they, and perhaps the other intelligentsia in Enugu have refused to point out the constitutional violations in what Governor Mbah is doing says a lot about the conspiracy.
In the 4th Schedule of the Nigerian Constitution, the powers of the local government areas are enunciated, and they exclusively include, as provided for in paragraph (e), the “establishment, maintenance and regulation of slaughterhouses, slaughter slab, markets, motor parks, and public conveniences.
Couldn’t our priests and the superfluous intellectual class have been bold enough to remind Governor Mbah of this constitutional provision, and by that token, make him realise (if he was not aware) that he was violating the constitution by usurping the powers of local councils?
Did they know but chose to keep the partnership working by keeping quiet? Your guess is as good as mine, but I know our people are beginning to realise the enemy which organised religion is, and I also know that for liberation to happen; for the people to fruitfully engage the state, the veil obfuscating the people’s eyes and minds has to drop.
And this will happen.
Onyebuchi UKWUABA
The religious leadership should be intentionally involved in the struggle to achieve good governance, not just to pay lip service and then, leave the masses at the mercy of political monsters.
Chukwuma Darlington
As beautiful as this piece might seem to appear am still worried that the writer, perhaps, is motivated to single out the Catholic Church and some of her priests, steming from the land dispute they had in the past (according to the writer). If not, why single out only Father Mbaka and Bishop Onah among the legion of priests in Enugu State? Are they the only vocal priests in Enugu State. What of the popular Bishop Chukwuma of the Anglican Communion and other notable men of God around?
This is just, assuming but not conceding to, that the government is anti people in trying to establish bus terminals of international standard in some parts of the state as painted by the writer. I do not want to dwell on that because that is not the intent of the write up. If not, we would have analysed, in critical terms, whether the government is doing the right thing or not but let we quickly remind the writer that the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, in no chapter or section, gave full autonomy to the local governments. The state, to a high extent, still controls the activities of the local government and, with that, has the authority to intervene in major projects like the mega bus terminals as presently embarked upon by Enugu State government. Anyway, as I said earlier, this is not the direction of the writer’s debate but on the Catholic Church.
In as much as I tend to align with the writer in some of his etymological citations on religion, I want also to observe that I sense a great sense of biase here.
Admin
Thanks for your comment.
The truth which most people try to run away from, and that includes you, is that there is no writer without his biases. The check is in how those biases impact the overall outcome. Your article never hid your own bias in favour of the Catholic Church.
Having said that, I doubt if you will disagree when I insist that the silence of the two clerics appear quite strange given their previous contributions on similar issues in the past. While there are other vocal priests in Enugu, how many operate on the scale of Mbaka and Bishop Onah? That is just one way of creating what I may call “objective bias” out of my intervention.
I also agree that the state exercises some control on the LGAs. But there are two questions. One, why did the constitution define the roles of the LGAs so clearly it does not overflow into the powers of the state? Two, who in the world collects revenue from a yearly tenant in April and serve him a notice to quit in May? Which Law empowers the state to give just a 72 hour notice to a tenant o quit, especially given that the tenant had paid his rent for the next one year?
If you are from Enugu State where the people are more than 80 percent Catholic, perhaps you will understand why the two priests were the focus. It will also help if you ask questions of the role of Bishop Onah during the last election and how he nearly divided the church because of how he wanted the priests o use the pulpit to campaign for a particular candidate. As for that land dispute, yes, it is important, when you understand that the people involved wrote the Bishop three letters that he refused to reply or attend to, until he was embarrassed with a court action, after which he visited the affected community and addressed the issue.
I am doing all these because I also suspect the writer made this comment with a fake email address, created perhaps for this purpose, but i am responding all the same.
And if I am challenged, I might release more damning facts ( I mean FACTS) that would damage the Bishop’s reputation. These include pictures and audio messages that I have restrained myself from bringing to the public.
Dear Darlington “Emenike Ezema” I do hope you would not be the one to provoke the full exposure of your Bishop. I make myself the veritable tool for such matters
Chris Onyishi
When will the people know. When the people know, there won’t be problem
Chukwuma Darlington
Dear Ikem Okuhu,
No doubts, I enjoy the intellect you display each time you write. I also appreciate the technicalities you apply especially in trying to promote your “biase”. Yes, biase, because you admitted so.
However, let me try to correct a wrong impression or what I may call a false allegation. You alleged that the writer created a fake email address for the purpose of this discussion or something like that. Perhaps you were referring to me or the another contributor to this discussion. If I’m the one then you are far from the truth. vibraven@gmail.com remains my official email address and it has been in existence for the past fifteen years or so.
Secondly, I also observed in your “technical” reply that for obvious reasons you refused to mention Bishop Chukwuma of the Anglican Communion as I pointed out but am not really worried about that because you have clearly accepted your biase, as common among writers like you. For me, academic or literary biases do not in any way demand for sacrificing facts at the alter of biase.
Thirdly, I still maintain that demolition by government, for the purpose of development, is as old as man. Even in your family, sometimes, you demolish old structures in order to erect new better ones. I have it for the grapevine that the demolition exercise is not meant to punish Nsukka people or any sect of people. As you you claimed that tenants were renewed that rents in January only to have their shops demolished in April, this is not an absolute truth. Take it from me that most tenants do not necessarily renew their rents in January. Some, obviously, do so in January. Some others in February and so on. Even the the midst of all that, some were at the verge of renewing theirs or had just renewed at the moment.
Be that as it may, the question is; how sure are you that the two priests you have brought to the alter as sacrificial lambs are not seeing things the same way am seeing them? Are you also aware that one of the oldest (if not the oldest) mission owned polytechnics, OSISATEC Polytechnic, Enugu was also involved in the demolition exercise? Is Fr Mbaka more vocal than the highly respected Rev Fr Prof Edeh whose congregation owns the polytechnic?
No need dwelling so much on this matter but as I have earlier said, your write up, as beautiful and well articulated as it is, is strongly rooted on biase. I don’t intend to delve into your personal relationship with Bishop Godfrey Igwebuike Onah vis a vis the so called land dispute because disputes are integral aspects of human relations. In the same vein, I am not a promoter of certain shortcomings of the church but I believe and insist that truth must be told based on equity and justice.
Good morning and happy Sunday
My name is Darlington Kingsley Chukwuma
Okwudili Obayi
Excellent piece. Should be read by all without bias.
Nwuke Prince
You are too sentimental about the religious landscape of Enugu state. Roman Catholics aren’t up to 80% of the state. That’s outright exaggeration.
Admin
Thank you. My stat may be wrong. But I am sure you agree they are a vast majority.